Skip to main content

Table 4 Assimilation and perceived ability of interpretation of scientific results among specialist- and non-specialist physiotherapists

From: Scientific approach and attitudes among clinically working physiotherapists in Sweden -a cross sectional survey

 

Total n = 1165

Not specialist n = 840

Specialist* n = 319

p-value**

Frequency of reading scientific articles about health, medicine, or physiotherapy % (n)

 Regularly/often

40.5 (469)

30.4 (255)

67.1 (214)

 

 Sometimes

39.2 (454)

43.8 (368)

27.0 (86)

 

 Rarely/never

20.4 (236)

25.8 (217)

6.0 (19)

 < .001

Number of scientific articles read during a normal month

 Mean (SD)

3.6 (6.0)

3.0 (5.9)

5.2 (6.2)

 < .001

 Md (IQR)

2 (1–4)

1 (1–3)

3 (2–5)

 < .001

Perceived ability to understand the structure and performance of scientific studies (study design, etc.)

 High/very high % (n)

42.2 (487)

48.5 (406)

82.3 (261)

 < .001

 Mean (SD) score 1 (very low) -5 (very high)

3.7 (0.8)

3.5 (0.7)

4.1 (0.7)

 < .001

Perceived ability to evaluate the methodology of scientific studies (identify bias, assess quality, etc.)

 High/very high % (n)

40.6 (468)

31.5 (263)

64.7 (205)

 < .001

 Mean (SD) score 1 (very low)-5 (very high)

3.4(0.8)

3.2 (0.8)

3.8 (0.7)

 < .001

Perceived ability to interpret statistical results from scientific studies? (significance/p-value, effect sizes, risk measures, confidence intervals, etc.)

 High/very high % (n)

25.6 (295)

18.6 (155)

43.9 (140)

 < .001

 Mean (SD) score 1 (very low)-5 (very high)

3.0 (0.9)

2.8 (0.9)

3.5 (0.8)

 < .001

Perceived ability to translate/implement results from scientific studies in your clinical practice

 High/very high % (n)

46.1 (521)

37.7 (307)

67.7 (214)

 < .001

 Mean (SD) score 1 (very low)-5 (very high)

3.4 (0.8)

3.3 (0.7)

3.8 (0.7)

 < .001

Sufficient knowledge/understanding or research for decision making regarding treatments

 Yes % (n)

67.8 (785)

61.3 (515)

85.2 (270)

 

 No

9.1 (105)

11.5 (97)

2.5 (8)

 

 Don’t know/can’t judge

23.1 (267)

27.1 (228)

12.3 (39)

 < .001

Sufficient education in scientific reading and understanding during undergraduate studies

 Yes I learned enough

30.3 (349)

31.8 (266)

26.3 (83)

 

 Yes, it was offered but I didn't take in the knowledge

6.4 (74)

6.3 (53)

6.6 (21)

 

 Yes I learned but have forgot most of it

23.2 (267)

28.2 (236)

9.8 (31)

 

 No, the education within this topic was insufficient

32.6 (376)

28.3 (237)

44.0 (139)

 

 Don’t remember

7.5 (86)

5.3 (44)

13.3 (42)

 < .001

  1. *Specialist = ongoing or completed specialist training
  2. **Comparison between specialists and non-specialists. Chi square test for categorical outcomes; Mann–Whitney U test for non-parametric rank comparison, and independent samples t-test for mean comparison of scale outcomes